<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RADE Milestone &#8211; Object Relational Mapping with NHibernate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geospecialling.com/index.php/2008/07/rade-milestone-object-relational-mapping-with-nhibernate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geospecialling.com/index.php/2008/07/rade-milestone-object-relational-mapping-with-nhibernate/</link>
	<description>Being a (G)IS Developer...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:31:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin Maidlow</title>
		<link>http://www.geospecialling.com/index.php/2008/07/rade-milestone-object-relational-mapping-with-nhibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin Maidlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geospecialling.com/index.php/2008/07/rade-milestone-object-relational-mapping-with-nhibernate/#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>Well its been a couple of years since I wrote this - and I&#039;m totally happy with my choice to switch to C#.  All new code is done in C#, but I still have a ton of code in VB.  Each time I need to work on a chunk of VB code, I decide whether to patch the VB or invest the time to re-write it in C#. I can&#039;t explain it - but working in VB actually makes me a little sad now.  Maybe its just nice to change things once and a while?  

I&#039;m completely in love with ReSharper - which had/has more complete support for C# (though I believe they&#039;re adding VB support more and more).   Finally, It seems to be easier to find new team members because the C syntax is so prevalent.  

Rather than jumping ship completely - try using C# on a new library or small project.   I used to use the online &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.developerfusion.com/tools/convert/vb-to-csharp/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VB.NET to C# conversion tool&lt;/a&gt; a LOT - even now I&#039;ll take an entire class of VB and convert it to C# and see how much good code I can pull out of the VB - at the very least you can get your event handlers and stuff moved over pretty quickly.  (ReSharper really comes in handy refactoring this converted code)

hope that helps =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well its been a couple of years since I wrote this &#8211; and I&#8217;m totally happy with my choice to switch to C#.  All new code is done in C#, but I still have a ton of code in VB.  Each time I need to work on a chunk of VB code, I decide whether to patch the VB or invest the time to re-write it in C#. I can&#8217;t explain it &#8211; but working in VB actually makes me a little sad now.  Maybe its just nice to change things once and a while?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m completely in love with ReSharper &#8211; which had/has more complete support for C# (though I believe they&#8217;re adding VB support more and more).   Finally, It seems to be easier to find new team members because the C syntax is so prevalent.  </p>
<p>Rather than jumping ship completely &#8211; try using C# on a new library or small project.   I used to use the online <a href="http://www.developerfusion.com/tools/convert/vb-to-csharp/" rel="nofollow">VB.NET to C# conversion tool</a> a LOT &#8211; even now I&#8217;ll take an entire class of VB and convert it to C# and see how much good code I can pull out of the VB &#8211; at the very least you can get your event handlers and stuff moved over pretty quickly.  (ReSharper really comes in handy refactoring this converted code)</p>
<p>hope that helps =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sierk</title>
		<link>http://www.geospecialling.com/index.php/2008/07/rade-milestone-object-relational-mapping-with-nhibernate/comment-page-1/#comment-6316</link>
		<dc:creator>Sierk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geospecialling.com/index.php/2008/07/rade-milestone-object-relational-mapping-with-nhibernate/#comment-6316</guid>
		<description>I know the feeling; my problem is that VB.NET is my strength and C# is not.  So if I work in VB I spend a ton of time looking for examples and if I work in C# I spent time as well, just figuring out syntax and such.  It’s like being between a rock and a hard place.  I have considered making the jump but VB is sooo comfortable right now :)  Aside from programming preferences and availability of samples would you suggest other compelling reasons for switching from C# to VB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the feeling; my problem is that VB.NET is my strength and C# is not.  So if I work in VB I spend a ton of time looking for examples and if I work in C# I spent time as well, just figuring out syntax and such.  It’s like being between a rock and a hard place.  I have considered making the jump but VB is sooo comfortable right now <img src='http://www.geospecialling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Aside from programming preferences and availability of samples would you suggest other compelling reasons for switching from C# to VB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

